Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lynn Shafer Willner's avatar

Thank you for writing about the Language Charts, Jessica. We’re truly excited that you’re using them and the resources you’re sharing are free.

May I offer a few technical clarifications based on our August 2025 article: Experts Answer WIDA Language Charts Questions: https://wida.wisc.edu/news/experts-answer-wida-language-charts-questions

1) What Proficiency Levels Are Used?

The Language Charts provide a plain-language extension of the 2020 Proficiency Level Descriptors. In 2020, we expanded the single K–12 continuum of Performance Definitions into six grade-level clusters:

• K

• 1

• 2–3

• 4–5

• 6–8

• 9–12

To situate those proficiency level interpretations, we focused on the *end* of each proficiency level. This is important because the article text describes the levels as ranging from Level 1 to Level 6, but in fact, the descriptors represent the *end* of each level (with Level 6 being open-ended):

• Level 6

• End of Level 5 – benchmarked with grade-level performance for that grade-level cluster

• End of Level 4

• End of Level 3

• End of Level 2

• End of Level 1

From the article:

Q: What proficiency level is targeted in the Language Chart descriptors?

A: The Language Charts describe student performance at the end of a proficiency level, similar to the Proficiency Level Descriptors in the 2020 Edition. These descriptors help educators understand and track where a student is headed on the language development continuum.

For example, an overall WIDA ACCESS score of 3.6 means the student is moving toward the End of Level 3 (approximately 3.9) in their language proficiency.

2) More Newcomer Support in Our Descriptors

The focus on the end of the level allows educators to use the spreadsheet version to create a sequence of End of Level 1 descriptors—especially helpful for grades 4–5, 6–8, and 9–12. This way, even if a student hasn’t yet reached End of Level 1 for their grade-level cluster, you can show they are making progress toward it.

From the article:

Q: Is there a breakdown within End of Levels 2 through 6, like the breakdown of descriptors leading up to End of Level 1?

A: No. The Language Chart descriptors for Levels 2 through 6 are presented along a continuum of language development; they are not broken down further. Refer to the Full Continua tabs (Tabs 17–20) in the Language Charts spreadsheet, which show student language development progression across six grade-level clusters (K, 1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–8, 9–12).

The continuum for End of Level 1 is unique. It was developed by referencing earlier grade-level clusters to illustrate how students begin building their language toward the end of Level 1.

3) Standards or Standards Framework?

Quick note: WIDA’s standards are referred to as a standards framework—to support local customization. In the article, I’d suggest replacing “WIDA ELD Standards” with “WIDA ELD Standards Framework.” This flexibility is very intentional and helps us support educators in the 42 states and jurisdictions in the WIDA consortium.

Best regards,

Lynn Shafer Willner, Ph.D.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?